• KNOWLEDGE JUSTICE (book)
• Indigenous Referencing Guidance for Indigenous Knowledges
• GLOBAL SOCIAL THEORY
• Counter Canon Racialised Scholars Reading List
• Decolonising This, Decolonising That: Beyond Rhetorical Decolonisation in Migration Studies
• PROTOCOLS For Non-Indigenous People Working with Indigenous Knowledge
• Mapping Indigenous Knowledge in the Digital Age
• Mapping Philippine Material Culture
• https://waysofknowing.org/thesauri/chicano
• https://www.blacksouthwestnetwork.org/unmuseum
• https://macmillan.yale.edu/southeast-asia/politics-good-reading-libraries-and-public-late-colonial-vietnam
• https://www.instagram.com/memoryandresistance/
• https://www.youthtransform.org/ytn-policy/decolonising-data-collection-in-humanitarian-work
• https://stage2.design.uic.edu/research/architecture-and-design-open-archive/
• https://meap.library.ucla.edu/
• https://www.dukeupress.edu/series/detours-the-decolonial-guide-series
• https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/08/12/guest-post-who-controls-knowledge-in-the-age-of-ai-part-1/
• OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic
• Inside the old church where one trillion webpages are being saved

Eurocentric science seeks principles that are universal and, as such, can be applied anywhere and any time. Born of empirical observation, made sense of by hypotheses which can, in turn, be empirically tested, Eurocentric science contradicts the faith in its knowledge. In effect, it suggests that all information is open to be disproved, thus severing it from temporal and geographic specificity. In so doing, it loses its meaning to context, and as David Suzuki has offered, such “a story … has lost its meaning, its purpose and its abilities to touch and inform.” (Battiste, 2013, citing Suzuki, 1997, pp. 19, 20)

• Andreotti, V. de O. (2011). (Towards) decoloniality and diversality in global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2011.605323
• Aranki, N., Hussein, A., Olufon, T., & Ochu, E. (2026, January 16). Who does the work? Liberatory Archives and Memory. https://www.liberatoryarchivesmemory.org/who-does-the-work/
• Bennett, K. (2007). Epistemicide!: The Tale of a Predatory Discourse. The Translator, 13(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2007.10799236
• Bennett, B., & Menzel, K. (2025). Indigenous research knowledges and their place in the Academy. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-92703-4
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, March 2). Tuskegee Study and Health Benefit Program. https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/index.html
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. D. (2018). #CommunicationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
• Cite Black Authors. (n.d.). https://www.citeblackauthors.com/
• Coates, T.-N. (2010, February 3). Henrietta Lacks and race. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2010/02/henrietta-lacks-and-race/35286/
• Congrats, You Have an All White Panel! (2015). https://allwhitepanels.tumblr.com/?og=1
• Dunn, A., Coiera, E., & Mandl, K. D. (2016). Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: A review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0006-7
• Farber, S. (2009). U.S. scientists’ role in the eugenics movement (1907–1939): A contemporary biologist’s perspective. Zebrafish, 5(4), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2008.0576
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
• Gatt, C. (2023). Decolonizing scholarship? Plural onto/epistemologies and the right to science. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1297747
• Glazer, R. (1998). Measuring the Knower: Towards a Theory of Knowledge Equity. California Management Review, 40(3), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165949
• Gliserman, N. (2021). Introduction: Unpacking the Meaning of Maps, Power, and Boundaries. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 110(4), 1–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45388535
• Graham, H. (2025). Deconstituting museums: Participation’s affective work. UCL Press. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10212738/1/Deconstituting-Museums.pdf
• Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514
• Hall, B. L., & Tandon, R. (2017). Decolonization of knowledge, epistemicide, participatory research and higher education. Research for All, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.01.1.02
• Horsthemke, K. (2025). Epistemic reparations and postcolonial pedagogy: Some conceptual decluttering. Ethics and Education, 20(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2025.2465093
• Iliadis, A., Siapera, E., & Lokot, T. (2023). Decolonising the internet: an introduction to the #AoIR2022 special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 26(12), 2369–2375. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2262554
• Jaffe, J. (2017), Knowledge Equity is Social Justice: Engaging a Practice Theory Perspective of Knowledge for Rural Transformation^†. Rural Sociology, 82: 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12143
• King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D. (2017). Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117738903
• Lamdan, S. (2022). Data cartels: The companies that control and monopolize our information. Stanford University Press.
• Laugesen, A. (2019). Globalizing the library: Librarians and development work, 1945–1970 (Routledge Studies in Library and Information Science). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351250924
• Leung, S. Y., & López-McKnight, J. R. (2021). Conclusion: Afterwor(l)ding toward Imaginative Dimensions. In S. Y. Leung & J. R. López-McKnight (Eds.), Knowledge Justice (pp. 317–334). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11969.003.0022
• Maron, N., Schaffner, J., & Kaufman, J. (2019). Open and equitable scholarly communications: Creating a more inclusive future. Association of College and Research Libraries.
• McKinney, C. (2020). Information activism: A queer history of lesbian media technologies. Duke University Press.
• Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, Decolonial options. Duke University Press.
• Mignolo, W. (2012a). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.
• Mignolo, W. (2012b). Decolonizing western epistemology / building decolonial epistemologies. In A. Isasi-Díaz & E. Mendieta (Eds.), Decolonizing Epistemologies: Latina/o Theology and Philosophy (pp. 19–43). Fordham University Press.
• Mignolo, W. (2021). The politics of decolonial investigations. Duke University Press.
• Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017). Citation matters: Mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of “conscientious engagement.” Gender, Place & Culture, 24(7), 954–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022
• Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., Bertolini, D., & Grimm, A. (2021). Interrupting epistemicide: A practical framework for naming, identifying, and ending epistemic injustice in the information professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(10), 1306–1318. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24479
• People of Color Also Know Stuff. (n.d.). https://sites.google.com/view/pocexperts/home
• Pitts, A. (2017). Decolonial praxis and epistemic injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. Routledge.
• Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. In Nepantla: Views from South. Duke University Press.
• Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178.
• Quijano, A. (2024). Aníbal Quijano: Foundational essays on the coloniality of power. Duke University Press.
• Sefa Dei, G. J., & Jajj, M. (Eds.). (2018). Knowledge and decolonial politics: A critical reader. Myers Education Press.
• Smith, C. A., & Garrett-Scott, D. (2021). “We are not named”: Black women and the politics of citation in anthropology. Feminist Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12038
• Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture. University of Illinois Press.
• Subject Guide: Decolonizing Scholarship. (n.d.). American University Library. https://subjectguides.library.american.edu/c.php?g=1025915&p=7749894
• Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124
• Yeon, J., et al. (2023). Epistemicide beyond borders: Addressing epistemic injustice in global library and information settings through critical international librarianship. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 7(1/2). https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v7i1/2.39251
• Zembylas, M. (2024). Decolonisation as dis-enclosure: Overcoming the dangers of positionality and identity in comparative education. Comparative Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2024.2326751